Identity as a hyperlink in the organization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35197/rx.04.02.2008.01.lcKeywords:
organizational culture, social identity and form of aquaculture productionAbstract
The processes of globalization and regionalization, together with the modernization of companies, are shaping a new world order that demands constant changes. The survival of organizations is increasingly related to their representation in the world, in culture, in communication processes, as well as in the individuals who form them. This can be explained by the fact that domestic markets are not as distant as in the past; they are currently immersed in a complex context and are constantly competing with each other and searching for world-class standards. Aquaculture organizations are no strangers to this. Because they have been established in the northern region of Sinaloa for relatively little time, aquaculture companies have been little studied. Therefore, they require more information about their operation, the type of subjects that form them, the social identity of their members, the communication and integration mechanisms that allow them to get to know each other, in addition to being prepared to successfully face the challenges that are presented to them, as well as the benefits they can obtain. The general objective of this research was to analyze the production method of a particular aquaculture farm and how it relates to the social identity of its members. Achieving this involved responding to a series of propositions and addressing theoretical aspects of social identity in the aquaculture production method, through three sections: a) the culture at the organizational, national and regional level; b) the identity in its personal, social and organizational spheres and c) the background of the aquaculture production method of the company. The scientific research process contributed to the discovery of knowledge, by testing the proposed propositions, given the need and interest in solving problems in this area. Therefore, in this case, quantitative and qualitative methods were used for data analysis. Six instruments were designed: structured questionnaire, structured and semi-structured interview, sociogram, projective technique and observation. Sampling was random and stratified, and population data such as age, seniority in the company, place of residence, gender, among other variables, were considered. The first instrument presented characteristics of an attitude scale (Likert) while the design and analysis of the sociogram was based on the work of Jacobo Moreno (cited in Cartwright 1986), and the projective technique following the definition of Reeve (1994). The results are shown in relation to the theoretical propositions on the identity of the organization and its most relevant indicators; the social and organizational identity; the influence of the aquaculture organization on its members; the production method of the company; the relationship between the production method of the company and its organizational culture and the social identity of individuals and the decision-making process of the organization. It was found that shrimp farming requires the participation of social identities specific to the culture of the region, which when grouped together make up the identity of the organization.
Downloads
References
Allaine, Yvan y Michaela E. Firsirotu. 1992. Teorías sobre la Cultura Organizacional. En H. Abarbanel (coord.), Cultura Organizacional, Colombia, Fondo editorial Legis, Bogotá. pp. 3-37.
Assaad, Azzi. 1996. Dinámica de los conflictos intergrupales y las formas de resolución de los conflictos. En R. Bourhis y JP Leyens (Ed) Estereotipos, Discriminación y Relaciones entre Grupos España, Mc.Graw Hill. pp. 285-306.
Barba, A. Antonio y Pedro, Solís 1997 “Cultura en las Organizaciones: Enfoques y Metáforas de los Estudios Organizacionales. México, vertiente editores.
Bardach, E. John, Ryther H. Johny y Mclarney O. William. 1990. Acuacultura. Mexico, A.G.T., Editor, S.A.
Castaingt, Juan. 1998. Los Sistemas Comerciales y Monetarios en la Triada Excluyente. Un punto de vista latinoamericano, México, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Iztapalapa.
Cioldi L. F. y Doise W. 1996. Identidad Social e Identidad Personal. En R. Bourhis y JP Leyens (Ed), Estereotipos, Discriminación y Relaciones entre Grupos. España, McGraw Hill. pp. 71-90.
Clegg, Stewart, y Clarke, Thomas. 1998. Changins Paradigms. The Transformation of Management Ford the XXI Century, Gran Bretaña Harper Collins Bussiness.
Clegg, Stewart, R. Cynthya, Ardi y Walter, R. Nord. 1996. HandBook of Organization Studies. Londres, Sage.
Cochran, William G. 1982. Técnicas de Muestreo. México, Editorial C.E.C.S.A.
Delgado, Raúl. 2004. De la Intangibilidad Cultural a la Tangibilidad de la Cultura Organizacional. Universidad de Occidente, Culiacán, Sinaloa, México.
Drucker, Meter. 1996. Líder del Futuro. España, Ediciones Deusto.
Feldman, Robert. 2000. Psicología con Aplicaciones para Iberoamérica. Mexico, McGraw Hill.
Guerra G. Ernesto. 2006. Paz y Conflicto Religioso: Los Indígenas de México. En La Complejidad Religiosa de los Estudiantes de la Universidad Autónoma Indígena de México. México, CONACULTA – INAH. pp. 229-251.
Martínez, G. Jerónimo. 2000. Las Razones de la Educación: Trama y Urdimbre del Hombre. México, Editorial Limusa.
Mintzberg, Henry. 1991a. Estructuración de las Organizaciones. Barcelona, Ariel. Mintzberg, Henry. 1991b. Mintzberg y la dirección. España, Díaz de Santos.
Nkomo, M., y P. Cox. 1996. Identidades Diversas en Organizaciones. HandBook Organization Studies.
Pantoja, C. Matilde, G. 2004. La Cultura de la Vida en una Organización. Primera edición, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa.
Páramo, Teresa. 1999. Social Identity, Telenovelas and The Reading Process. Ten Case Studies Among Hispanics in Texas. The University of Texas at Austin. Austin, Tx: Tesis Doctoral.
Páramo, Teresa. 2000. Identidad Social y Estereotipos Femeninos. México, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Iztapalapa.
Powell, Walter W. y Paul J. DiMaggio. 1996. El Nuevo Institucionalismo en el Análisis Organizacional. México, Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Rice, Phillip, F. 2001. Desarrollo Humano: Estudio del Ciclo Vital. México, Prentice Hall Hispanoamericana, S.A.
Robbins, P, Stephen. 1999. Comportamiento Organizacional: Conceptos, controversias y aplicaciones. Octava edición, Prentice may, México.
Rodríguez. M., Darío 1999 “Diagnóstico Organizacional”, México, Alfa Omega. Rubio, L. 1999. El Tratado de Libre Comercio en el Desarrollo de México. México,
Editorial Cal y Arena.
Sandoval F. Eduardo, A. 2006. Paz y Conflicto Religioso: Los Indígenas de México. En Paz y Conflicto Religioso los Indígenas Mazahuas de México, México, CONACULTA – INAH. pp. 13-191.
Shein, Edward. 1991. The Role of The Founder in The Creation of Organizational Culture. En Peter Frost et al (dir). Refraning Organizational Culture, Sage Publications, Newbury park. pp. 39-54.
Siliceo A. Alfonso, Casares A. David, González M. José Luis. 1999. Liderazgo, Valores y Cultura Organizacional: Hacia una Organización Competitiva. México, McGraw Hill.
Wheaton, M. Fredrick. 1998. Acuacultura: Diseño y Construcción de Sistemas. México,
A. G. T. Editor, S.A.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2008 Lorena Guadalupe Castro Almeida
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Usted es libre de:
- Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
- Adaptar — remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material
- La licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades en tanto usted siga los términos de la licencia
Bajo los siguientes términos:
- Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada , brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios . Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.
- NoComercial — Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales .
- No hay restricciones adicionales — No puede aplicar términos legales ni medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otras a hacer cualquier uso permitido por la licencia.