Ethnic identity and the relationship of indigenous peoples with the Mexican State
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35197/rx.01.02.2005.02.MSKeywords:
ethnic identity, multicultural, pluriculturalAbstract
Ethnic identity has transcended from a simple differentiation from others to become a tool of ethnopolitical struggle, which is currently used by the indigenous peoples of Mexico to relate to the State in a different way. This implies understanding the different interethnic relations that occur in the national and even global environment, where globalization is paradoxically causing the local to regain strength to differentiate itself. This is the case of the indigenous peoples who had been subjugated by the liberal regime during the 19th and 20th centuries and in the new millennium; these peoples seek to free themselves from this subjugation, identifying themselves as social subjects with their own voice and fighting for their rights in order to be respected as they are, to have their culture and their (customary) rights recognized as a first step, to then advance in the integration of a multicultural society and in the construction of a pluricultural State. In the case of Mexico, there have been advances and setbacks in this regard, since currently there is an article 2 of the Political Constitution that partially recognizes the culture and rights of indigenous peoples, but no regulatory law has been drafted and despite the fact that the old National Indigenous Institute changed its name to the National Commission for the Development of Indigenous Peoples, the Mexican State continues to practice an old-fashioned indigenous policy, that is, one of an assistance nature that does not allow for a different relationship than before, between the State and indigenous peoples. What is the underlying problem? This is what this work tries to elucidate, putting on the table a series of points for discussion.
Downloads
References
Arizpe, L.
“Cultura y Desarrollo. Una etnografía de las creencias de una comunidad mexicana”. UNAM, Colegio de México y Miguel Ángel Porrúa, México. 273 p.
Cuche, D.
“La noción de cultura en las ciencias sociales”. Ediciones Nueva Visión, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 367 p.
Chihu, A. A.
“Introducción: Sociología de la Identidad”. UAM-Ixtapalapa, Miguel Ángel Porrúa, México. 377 p.
Geertz, C.
“La interpretación de las culturas”. Gedisa editorial, España. 542 p.
Gímenez, G.
“Paradigmas de la identidad”. In: Sociología de la Identidad. Aquiles Chihu Amparán coordinador. UAM-Ixtapalapa, Miguel Angel Porrúa, México. 412 p.
UNESCO
“Nuestra Diversidad Creativa”. Informe de la comisión mundial de cultura y desarrollo. Javier Pérez de Cuellar coordinador. Correo de la UNESCO, México. 98 p.
Vázquez, R.
“Liberalismo, Estado de derecho y minorías”. Paidós, UNAM-Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, México. 563 p.
Villoro, L.
“Estado plural, pluralidad de culturas”. Paidós, UNAM, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, México. 324 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2005 Miguel Ángel Sámano Rentería
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Usted es libre de:
- Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
- Adaptar — remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material
- La licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades en tanto usted siga los términos de la licencia
Bajo los siguientes términos:
- Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada , brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios . Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.
- NoComercial — Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales .
- No hay restricciones adicionales — No puede aplicar términos legales ni medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otras a hacer cualquier uso permitido por la licencia.