Diagnosis of the Use of Wildlife in the Flora and Fauna Protection Area “Usumacinta Canyon”, Tenosique, Tabasco

Authors

  • Alfredo Hernández López
  • Eduardo López Alamilla
  • Ana Rodríguez Ramírez
  • Victoria Aquino Bravata

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35197/rx.09.01.e.2013.01.ah

Keywords:

Wildlife, hunding, use of wildlife, commerce

Abstract

The use of wildlife is described in 7 locations on the Redención del Campesino-San Francisco route within the Usumacinta Canyon Flora and Fauna Protection Area, located in Tenosique, Tabasco. The work offers information on the traditions of wildlife use by local residents and the way of understanding the activity in the region. The cultural valuation of wildlife is described, identifying and quantifying the recognized and used species; the modalities and pressure of use on some species; capture arts, characterizing the profile of hunters. A total of 26 species of fauna were recorded (12 mammals, 12 birds and 2 reptiles); mammals were the most recognized and used by the inhabitants, in second order birds. The use of fauna in these communities is closely related to knowledge and tradition. The most frequent uses were detected: food, pets and in the background, artisanal and medicinal uses. Hunters use dogs, firearms and other tools such as machetes, traps and slingshots to obtain them. The main motivation of hunters is subsistence, an exclusively male activity, in groups and occasionally individually.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cervantes, F., G. Matamoros & I. Martínez. 1995. Mamíferos Silvestres de la unidad de evaluación y monitoreo de la biodiversidad “Ing. Luis Macías Arellano”, San Cayetano, Estado de México. Anales del Instituto de Biología UNAM, Serie Zoología, 66:233-239.

Diario Oficial de la Federación (DOF), 2008.

McNeely, J.A. 1988. Economics and biological diversity. UICN, Gland, Suiza. 236 pp.

Ojasti J., y F. Dallmeier (editor). 2000. Manejo de FaunaSilvestreNeotropical. SI/MAB Series # 5.

Smithsonian Institution/MAB Biodiversity Program, Washington D.C.

Peña, A., D. Smith & C. Echegaray. 1998. Conservación. Pp 183–210. In: La diversidad biológica de México. CONABIO, México, D.F

Pineda, R. 1987. El método etnográfico, un enfoquecualitativo de investigación social. En: Texto ycontexto. No. 11. Universidad Nacional deColombia. Pp 97-108.

Schuerholz, G. y G. Mann. 1979. Proposición para la administración y el manejo de los recursos de vida Silvestre en Chile. FAO DP/CHI/76/003, Santiago, Chile. 63 pp.

UNEP. 1993. Guidelines for country studies on biological diversity. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi. 97 pp.

Usher, M.D., ed. 1986. Wildlife conservation education. Chapmann and Hall, London. 394 pp. Wing, L.W. 1951. Practice of wildlife conservation. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 421 pp.

Published

2013-04-30

How to Cite

Hernández López, A., López Alamilla, E., Rodríguez Ramírez, A., & Aquino Bravata, V. (2013). Diagnosis of the Use of Wildlife in the Flora and Fauna Protection Area “Usumacinta Canyon”, Tenosique, Tabasco. Revista Ra Ximhai , 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.35197/rx.09.01.e.2013.01.ah

Issue

Section

Artículos científicos